Distal hypospadias repair: Comparative study between snodgrass and transverse preputial onlay flap.

INTRODUCTION: Distal hypospadias repair has several operative strategies such as tubularized incised plate (TIP); Transverse preputial onlay flap (TPOF) and Modified Mathieu Procedure. The aim of our work is to compare between TIP and TPOF techniques in the outcome. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted this comparative study on 66 patients with different types of distal hypospadias divided in two groups A and B for TIP and TPOF respectively. We reported outcome and complications for both TIP and TPOF repair. Our results revealed mean operative time was significantly higher in group B (123.1 ± 6.8 min) than in group A (93.73 ± 3.9 min, P value < 0.001). Postoperative urinary fistula was reported in group A (15.2%) while no fistula in group B (p value = 0.05). The vertical slit appearance of meatus was better in group A (54.5%) than in group B (24.2%, P value 0.023). As regard to hypospadias objective scoring evaluation (HOSE) (Summary Figure) the meatal shape score was higher in group A (1.55 ± 0.51) than in group B (1.24 ± 0.44, p value = 0.0 l), the urinary stream score was significantly higher in group A (1.82 ± 0.39) than in group B (1.97 ± 0.17, p value = 0.04) and the urinary fistula score was significantly higher in group A (3.79 ± 0.60) than in group B (4 ± 0, p value = 0.04). DISCUSSION: Complications are more common after TIP than in TPOF. As regard the meatus shape, the naturally looking vertical slit like meatus was achieved more in the TIP than in TPOF. We advocate further studies with a large number of patients with a long follow up period. CONCLUSION: TPOF is a great option to consider in cases of distal hypospadias because it is an effective technique for primary distal hypospadias repair with a good cosmetic outcome and a low associated complication.

One-Shot Dilatation vs Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background: The creation and dilatation of the nephrostomy tract is a fundamental step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). In one-shot dilatation (OSD), we used a single Amplatz dilator over a central Alken rod. PCNL in the supine position is as effective and safe as in the prone position. The Barts flank-free modified supine position sums several advantages of the different supine positions. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of OSD compared with metal telescopic dilator (MTD) during PCNL while the patient was in Barts flank-free modified supine position. Materials and Methods: Within 2.5 years, 150 patients with kidney stone candidates for PCNL were randomized into two equal groups according to the dilatation technique. In the OSD group, dilatation was performed using a single Amplatz dilator (30F) and in the MTD group dilatation was performed by sequential MTD (9-30F). All PCNL procedures were done with patients in Barts flank-free modified supine position. Patient characteristics, operative data, and results were collected for statistical analysis. Results: There are no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding patients' characters. The tracts were effectively dilated in all patients. Statistical analyses show a significant difference (p ˂ 0.05) between both groups regarding the time of dilatation (seconds; 68 ± 15 vs 147 ± 18), time of X-ray exposure (seconds; during dilatation; 36 ± 10 vs 61 ± 15 and the total; 157 ± 16 vs 181 ± 20), hemoglobin loss (mg/dL; 0.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.3), and hospital stay (days; 3 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 0.7) with favorable results to OSD. Complication rates were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: OSD is efficient as MTD during PCNL while patients are in Barts flank-free modified supine position, with less dilatation time, X-ray exposure, blood loss, and hospital stay than MTD.